HomeBlog › Dancing With The Stars: Dance Types Leading To The Most Eliminations Revealed! (According To 20+ Years Of Data)
News

Dancing With The Stars: Dance Types Leading To The Most Eliminations Revealed! (According To 20+ Years Of Data)

Ardelia Team · September 15, 2026 · 1 min read

Cha-Cha-Cha Has Coincided With the Most ‘Dancing With the Stars’ Eliminations, Analysis Finds

Contestants performing the cha-cha-cha have been eliminated more often than those assigned any other dance style on Dancing With the Stars, based on an ActionNetwork.com review of the show’s first 34 seasons.

The analysis counted 41 eliminations following cha-cha-cha performances, ahead of tango with 33 and paso doble with 32. It reviewed more than 2,800 dance numbers from the competition’s 2005 debut through 2025, covering more than 500 episodes.

The findings arrive ahead of the program’s 35th season, though the results reflect historical correlations rather than evidence that a dance itself determines voting or elimination outcomes.

ActionNetwork.com also assigned negative-point values to bottom-five, bottom-three and bottom-two finishes, as well as eliminations. Under that measure, the cha-cha-cha again ranked as the riskiest style, with 182 negative points. Tango followed with 178 points, while samba ranked third at 169.

Other styles near the top of the elimination count included rumba, with 31, samba with 29, and foxtrot and Viennese waltz, tied at 28.

Quickstep produced the highest number of advances to the following round in the review, at 206. Jive was close behind with 205 progressions, followed by foxtrot with 200. Paso doble, despite ranking third in total eliminations, was associated with 169 advances.

The data set included results such as eliminations, safety, bottom placements, immunity, withdrawals and final placements. For its negative-point ranking, ActionNetwork.com assigned one point for a bottom-five placement, two for bottom three, three for bottom two and four for an elimination.

The analysis excluded performances that did not produce a defined result, including group dances and episodes in which no contestants were sent home. When a performance combined two dance styles, each style was counted separately in the outcome totals, meaning the figures are not a measure of unique couples or individual routines. The underlying data was compiled from Dancing With the Stars Wikipedia pages.

Featured here? Grab your badge →

Free to embed. Links back to this article. No email required.

Keep reading

News

Higher Ed HR Lands in Philly

Hi Matthew, The CUPA-HR Annual Conference brings more than 900 higher education HR professionals to the *Philadelphia Marriott Downtown Oct. 5-7*, making the city a hub for one of the country's most consequential workforce conversations. *U.S. colleges and universities eliminated more than **9,000 positions in 2025 alone*

Ardelia Team · September 15, 2026 · 1 min read

News

Alex Bores and Anna Myers Launch Who Decides, a $30 Million Effort to Build the Winning Democratic Answer to AI

Who Decides will bring labor, parents, educators, civil-rights groups and other trusted organizations together around a common AI safety agenda for Democrats. NEW YORK, NEW YORK — Who Decides, a new $30 milli

Ardelia Team · September 15, 2026 · 2 min read

News

How boards govern GenAI adoption

Dear Matthew, New research finds that boards are doing more learning, reskilling and partnering than using AI as a pretext for mass layoffs. The research, from INSEAD Business School, surveyed directors of 83 mostly largely European and US companies. The specific findings are a useful reality check to predicting what happens next in the workplace: * Nearly half of companies report moderate productivity improvements, while another 18% see a significant or transformational impact. * Nearly half of directors say AI has already displaced tasks or roles. Yet only 11% r

Ardelia Team · September 15, 2026 · 1 min read

Run a company that never sleeps

Found your AI company — executives, standups, debates, and decisions, around the clock.

Found your company →